The latest issue of the journal History of the Human Sciences contains an article on the early history of psychology by Jacques Bos of the Department of Philosophy at the University of Amsteram. Bos’s article is titled “The rise and decline of character: humoral psychology in ancient and early modern medical theory.” The article’s abstract reads:
Humoralism, the view that the human body is composed of a limited number of elementary fluids, is one of the most characteristic aspects of ancient medicine. The psychological dimension of humoral theory in the ancient world has thus far received a relatively small amount of scholarly attention. Medical psychology in the ancient world can only be correctly understood by relating it to psychological thought in other fields, such as ethics and rhetoric. The concept that ties these various domains together is character (êthos), which involves a view of human beings focused on clearly distinguishable psychological types that can be recognized on the basis of external signs. Psychological ideas based on humoral theory remained influential well into the early modern period. Yet, in 17th-century medicine and philosophy, humoral physiology and psychology started to lose ground to other theoretical perspectives on the mind and its relation to the body. This decline of humoralist medical psychology can be related to a broader reorientation of psychological thought in which the traditional concept of character lost its central position. Instead of the focus on types and stable character traits, a perspective emerged that was primarily concerned with individuality and transient passions.
Though one must not forget that Lorenz also said (at the 1938 meeting of the German Psychological Society): “people’s genetically determined social behavior is important for the exclusion of those types whose dangerous virulent propagation threatens to invade the body of the nation. He urged further genetic research to discover the facts that solidify “our holiest racial, and human heritage”